<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 622 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and addressing the respondent&#039;s cross-objection. It affirmed the validity of relinquishing goods under Section 23(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, and deemed the duty demand unsustainable. The Tribunal highlighted legislative intent and the CBEC Circular, supporting the right to abandon goods, with auction proceeds offsetting duty loss to the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 622 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and addressing the respondent&#039;s cross-objection. It affirmed the validity of relinquishing goods under Section 23(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, and deemed the duty demand unsustainable. The Tribunal highlighted legislative intent and the CBEC Circular, supporting the right to abandon goods, with auction proceeds offsetting duty loss to the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>