<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 602 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by rejecting further disallowance under Section 14A and Rule 8D. The issue of depreciation was remitted back to the Assessing Officer. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the treatment of loss as capital loss and deleting additions related to written back liabilities and unexplained credits. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 31.01.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 602 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by rejecting further disallowance under Section 14A and Rule 8D. The issue of depreciation was remitted back to the Assessing Officer. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the treatment of loss as capital loss and deleting additions related to written back liabilities and unexplained credits. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 31.01.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>