<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 587 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled against the applicant, denying Cenvat credit for irregular credit based on supplementary invoices, citing Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The Tribunal held that the recovery mechanism against the supplier impacted the demand, linking the appeal with the supplier&#039;s case and ordering a pre-deposit while staying recovery proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 587 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled against the applicant, denying Cenvat credit for irregular credit based on supplementary invoices, citing Rule 9(1)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The Tribunal held that the recovery mechanism against the supplier impacted the demand, linking the appeal with the supplier&#039;s case and ordering a pre-deposit while staying recovery proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>