<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 585 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellants for issuing invoices without supplying goods, despite their arguments regarding settlement by the Settlement Commission and the applicability of penalties under Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions, emphasizing legal precedents and the deliberate fraudulent actions of the appellants. The penalty was maintained without reduction, with the Tribunal dismissing the appeal and affirming the initial penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 585 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellants for issuing invoices without supplying goods, despite their arguments regarding settlement by the Settlement Commission and the applicability of penalties under Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions, emphasizing legal precedents and the deliberate fraudulent actions of the appellants. The penalty was maintained without reduction, with the Tribunal dismissing the appeal and affirming the initial penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>