<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 582 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255383</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 338 days, finding that the Tribunal did not properly assess the reasons for the delay. The Court held that the Tribunal expected an unreasonable level of diligence from the appellant and deemed the Tribunal&#039;s order as perverse. Consequently, the appeal was admitted in favor of the appellant, with directions for the Tribunal to promptly address the appeal and stay application on merits. The Court also instructed the provision of urgent copies of the order to the parties upon request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 582 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255383</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 338 days, finding that the Tribunal did not properly assess the reasons for the delay. The Court held that the Tribunal expected an unreasonable level of diligence from the appellant and deemed the Tribunal&#039;s order as perverse. Consequently, the appeal was admitted in favor of the appellant, with directions for the Tribunal to promptly address the appeal and stay application on merits. The Court also instructed the provision of urgent copies of the order to the parties upon request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>