<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 579 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255380</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit. The Court did not record any substantive determination on the underlying central excise issue beyond refusing to interfere with the impugned order. The operative effect is that the appellant&#039;s challenge failed and the dismissal stood confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 579 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255380</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeal was dismissed as devoid of merit. The Court did not record any substantive determination on the underlying central excise issue beyond refusing to interfere with the impugned order. The operative effect is that the appellant&#039;s challenge failed and the dismissal stood confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>