<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 557 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, disallowing the commission payments to the directors and supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s valuation of the industrial plot for Long Term Capital Gain calculation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and appropriate valuation methods, citing precedents to justify its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 557 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal, disallowing the commission payments to the directors and supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s valuation of the industrial plot for Long Term Capital Gain calculation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and appropriate valuation methods, citing precedents to justify its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>