<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 548 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax liability on construction activities for government bodies and Goods Transport Agency Service. The appellant contested the service tax demand related to constructing plants for Municipal bodies and Government, arguing that the specific service for demanding service tax was not mentioned in the notice. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, emphasizing the importance of correctly classifying services and applying relevant laws for determining service tax payment. The case was remanded for a fresh consideration with an opportunity for a personal hearing for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 548 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax liability on construction activities for government bodies and Goods Transport Agency Service. The appellant contested the service tax demand related to constructing plants for Municipal bodies and Government, arguing that the specific service for demanding service tax was not mentioned in the notice. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, emphasizing the importance of correctly classifying services and applying relevant laws for determining service tax payment. The case was remanded for a fresh consideration with an opportunity for a personal hearing for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>