https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255333 The label dispute over an imported food consignment turned on a factual inquiry into whether the package labels were originally affixed by the manufacturer or exporter, or were tampered with, and that issue was not suitable for final determination on the existing writ record. The Delhi HC therefore declined to conclusively decide compliance in writ jurisdiction and directed a fresh inspection by the authorized officer after due notice to the petitioner. The officer was also required to consider the FSSAI guidelines and the circular or notice dated 24-1-2013 relied on by the petitioner. The matter was thus remitted for reconsideration, with no final merits determination on labeling compliance. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jan 2015 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255333 The label dispute over an imported food consignment turned on a factual inquiry into whether the package labels were originally affixed by the manufacturer or exporter, or were tampered with, and that issue was not suitable for final determination on the existing writ record. The Delhi HC therefore declined to conclusively decide compliance in writ jurisdiction and directed a fresh inspection by the authorized officer after due notice to the petitioner. The officer was also required to consider the FSSAI guidelines and the circular or notice dated 24-1-2013 relied on by the petitioner. The matter was thus remitted for reconsideration, with no final merits determination on labeling compliance. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255333