<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 527 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255328</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Revisional Authority&#039;s decision to deny the rebate claim under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, finding that the petitioners were not entitled to rebate as they had availed the exemption under Notification No.39/2001CE. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the Revisional Authority&#039;s order was consistent with the relevant notifications and did not suffer from any illegality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 527 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255328</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Revisional Authority&#039;s decision to deny the rebate claim under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, finding that the petitioners were not entitled to rebate as they had availed the exemption under Notification No.39/2001CE. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the Revisional Authority&#039;s order was consistent with the relevant notifications and did not suffer from any illegality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>