<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 517 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255318</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete various additions and disallowances made by the AO, including trading additions, section 2(22)(e) additions, and disallowances under sections 80IB and 80IA. The ITAT also remanded certain issues for fresh decisions but dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals in most instances. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 517 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255318</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete various additions and disallowances made by the AO, including trading additions, section 2(22)(e) additions, and disallowances under sections 80IB and 80IA. The ITAT also remanded certain issues for fresh decisions but dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals in most instances. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>