<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 507 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to undisclosed investments and income from land transactions due to lack of supporting evidence. It emphasized procedural correctness in initiating proceedings under section 147 but dismissed an appeal against a deceased person on technical grounds. The importance of corroborative evidence in tax assessments and procedural adherence was highlighted in the Tribunal&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 507 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to undisclosed investments and income from land transactions due to lack of supporting evidence. It emphasized procedural correctness in initiating proceedings under section 147 but dismissed an appeal against a deceased person on technical grounds. The importance of corroborative evidence in tax assessments and procedural adherence was highlighted in the Tribunal&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>