<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>&#039;Pleading, a ground of appeal&#039; which appears to root of jurisdiction can be raised for first time before Commissioner (Appeals)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6009</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that a contention that the appellant was not the service provider but the recipient is a ground going to the root of jurisdiction, not merely evidence, and therefore may be raised for the first time on appeal; the appeals-rule exclusion for newly advanced grounds does not apply to such jurisdictional pleas and the plea must be examined on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:21:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:21:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>&#039;Pleading, a ground of appeal&#039; which appears to root of jurisdiction can be raised for first time before Commissioner (Appeals)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6009</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that a contention that the appellant was not the service provider but the recipient is a ground going to the root of jurisdiction, not merely evidence, and therefore may be raised for the first time on appeal; the appeals-rule exclusion for newly advanced grounds does not apply to such jurisdictional pleas and the plea must be examined on its merits.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:21:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>