<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for unutilized Cenvat Credit by a 100% E.O.U. engaged in the export of slate stone and sand stone, deeming a portion of the claim time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Notification No. 05/2006-CX (NT). The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, citing precedents and legal provisions supporting the time limitation for such refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:28:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for unutilized Cenvat Credit by a 100% E.O.U. engaged in the export of slate stone and sand stone, deeming a portion of the claim time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Notification No. 05/2006-CX (NT). The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, citing precedents and legal provisions supporting the time limitation for such refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>