<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 495 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255296</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai as non-maintainable because the appellants failed to make the mandatory pre-deposit of penalties as per Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the appellants&#039; argument of lack of natural justice principles in the impugned order, the tribunal upheld the dismissal citing non-fulfillment of the statutory requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 495 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255296</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai as non-maintainable because the appellants failed to make the mandatory pre-deposit of penalties as per Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the appellants&#039; argument of lack of natural justice principles in the impugned order, the tribunal upheld the dismissal citing non-fulfillment of the statutory requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>