https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255294 The court held that the circular issued by the DGFT mandating a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Department of Defence Production (DoDP) for the export of bulletproof vests was not in conformity with the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act). The court set aside the circular, directing the DGFT to specify the list of military stores requiring an NOC within eight weeks. In the interim, the petitioner was allowed to export non-lethal items not explicitly restricted under the FTP or any other law. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255294 The court held that the circular issued by the DGFT mandating a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Department of Defence Production (DoDP) for the export of bulletproof vests was not in conformity with the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (FTDR Act). The court set aside the circular, directing the DGFT to specify the list of military stores requiring an NOC within eight weeks. In the interim, the petitioner was allowed to export non-lethal items not explicitly restricted under the FTP or any other law. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255294