<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 475 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255276</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessment was not time-barred as the amendment to the Income Tax Act extended the limitation period for block assessment. The Court also found that the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity of hearing during the assessment proceedings, leading to the matter being remanded for fresh adjudication to uphold principles of natural justice. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue on both issues, disposing of all appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 475 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255276</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessment was not time-barred as the amendment to the Income Tax Act extended the limitation period for block assessment. The Court also found that the assessee was not given a reasonable opportunity of hearing during the assessment proceedings, leading to the matter being remanded for fresh adjudication to uphold principles of natural justice. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue on both issues, disposing of all appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>