<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 471 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255272</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, finding the questions raised irrelevant. It clarified that deductions under Sections 80I and 80HH should be made independently from the gross total income. Following the Supreme Court precedent, the Court ruled that new industrial undertakings can claim deductions under both sections separately. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:53:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 471 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255272</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, finding the questions raised irrelevant. It clarified that deductions under Sections 80I and 80HH should be made independently from the gross total income. Following the Supreme Court precedent, the Court ruled that new industrial undertakings can claim deductions under both sections separately. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>