https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255251 The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals, remanding the case for reconsideration of evidence regarding turnover and cash discounts without requiring them to be shown on invoices. The claim for cum-duty benefit was to be reviewed, and the appellants were granted an opportunity for a denovo adjudication process. Penalties for suppression of facts were not upheld as the issue was deemed to be related to valuation rather than deliberate evasion. en-us Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255251 The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals, remanding the case for reconsideration of evidence regarding turnover and cash discounts without requiring them to be shown on invoices. The claim for cum-duty benefit was to be reviewed, and the appellants were granted an opportunity for a denovo adjudication process. Penalties for suppression of facts were not upheld as the issue was deemed to be related to valuation rather than deliberate evasion. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255251