<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 444 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the suspension order, deeming it unsustainable due to non-compliance with procedural requirements under Regulation 22 of CHALR, 2004. The continuation of suspension without initiating the enquiry process under Regulation 22 was found unjustified. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of issuing a show cause notice within the specified timeframe for a valid suspension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 444 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the suspension order, deeming it unsustainable due to non-compliance with procedural requirements under Regulation 22 of CHALR, 2004. The continuation of suspension without initiating the enquiry process under Regulation 22 was found unjustified. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of issuing a show cause notice within the specified timeframe for a valid suspension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>