<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 443 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255244</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confiscating Indian currency as sale proceeds of contraband gold. It accepted the appellant&#039;s claim that the seized amount was a loan from a named individual, supported by the ITAT findings. The penalty imposed under the Customs Act and Income Tax Act was deemed unsustainable, emphasizing the loan nature of the amount. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, concluding that the confiscated currency was legitimate, leading to the dismissal of penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 443 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255244</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confiscating Indian currency as sale proceeds of contraband gold. It accepted the appellant&#039;s claim that the seized amount was a loan from a named individual, supported by the ITAT findings. The penalty imposed under the Customs Act and Income Tax Act was deemed unsustainable, emphasizing the loan nature of the amount. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, concluding that the confiscated currency was legitimate, leading to the dismissal of penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>