<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 441 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging refund claims rejection based on the failure to challenge assessment orders before filing the claims. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and challenging assessment orders within the prescribed framework. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of accurate declaration of goods and compliance with statutory provisions for claiming duty benefits under relevant notifications, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue based on established legal principles and case law precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 441 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging refund claims rejection based on the failure to challenge assessment orders before filing the claims. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and challenging assessment orders within the prescribed framework. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of accurate declaration of goods and compliance with statutory provisions for claiming duty benefits under relevant notifications, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue based on established legal principles and case law precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>