<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 418 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case after the appellant&#039;s submissions on financial difficulty, incorrect remittance, strong prima facie case, and reference to supportive judicial decisions. The impugned decision was set aside, directing the original authority to reassess the matter considering the appellant&#039;s arguments and potential refund claims for the amount already paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 418 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case after the appellant&#039;s submissions on financial difficulty, incorrect remittance, strong prima facie case, and reference to supportive judicial decisions. The impugned decision was set aside, directing the original authority to reassess the matter considering the appellant&#039;s arguments and potential refund claims for the amount already paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>