<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 414 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255215</link>
    <description>A one-day delay in filing the appeal was satisfactorily explained and condoned. The Tribunal also granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery during the appeal because the dispute was treated as covered by an earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case on similar facts, where service tax was held not leviable. The operative effect was that the appeal could proceed without immediate deposit, and recovery action remained suspended pending disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 414 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255215</link>
      <description>A one-day delay in filing the appeal was satisfactorily explained and condoned. The Tribunal also granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery during the appeal because the dispute was treated as covered by an earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case on similar facts, where service tax was held not leviable. The operative effect was that the appeal could proceed without immediate deposit, and recovery action remained suspended pending disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>