https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255209 The High Court affirmed the Appellate Tribunal's authority to extend stays beyond 365 days under Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized the need for the Tribunal to pass detailed, reasoned orders when granting extensions, setting specific criteria for evaluation. Existing non-speaking orders were remanded for fresh consideration with a directive to provide detailed orders within a specified timeframe, enhancing transparency and procedural adherence. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:53:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255209 The High Court affirmed the Appellate Tribunal's authority to extend stays beyond 365 days under Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized the need for the Tribunal to pass detailed, reasoned orders when granting extensions, setting specific criteria for evaluation. Existing non-speaking orders were remanded for fresh consideration with a directive to provide detailed orders within a specified timeframe, enhancing transparency and procedural adherence. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255209