<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 389 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255190</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant on the second question, allowing the claim for the loss incurred during business activities. However, the Court decided against the appellant on the first question, upholding the addition related to the purchase of gold. The appeal was allowed only to the extent mentioned, with no costs awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 389 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255190</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant on the second question, allowing the claim for the loss incurred during business activities. However, the Court decided against the appellant on the first question, upholding the addition related to the purchase of gold. The appeal was allowed only to the extent mentioned, with no costs awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>