<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 386 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255187</link>
    <description>The appellant, a builder/developer, faced proceedings for not paying service tax on various charges collected from customers during the construction of residential complexes. The department argued for inclusion of these charges in the taxable value under the Construction of Complex Service. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the department on tax liability for certain charges but found the extended period for tax demand not applicable before 01.07.2010. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the demanded tax amount with interest for the normal period to hear the appeal, allowing a partial deposit to stay the recovery of balance dues during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 386 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255187</link>
      <description>The appellant, a builder/developer, faced proceedings for not paying service tax on various charges collected from customers during the construction of residential complexes. The department argued for inclusion of these charges in the taxable value under the Construction of Complex Service. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the department on tax liability for certain charges but found the extended period for tax demand not applicable before 01.07.2010. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the demanded tax amount with interest for the normal period to hear the appeal, allowing a partial deposit to stay the recovery of balance dues during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>