<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255176</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the duty demand against M/s. Agmotex Ltd. for evasion through parallel invoices and unrecorded production, resulting in penalties on the Director and Manager. The penalties were reduced due to disproportionality. The decision stressed the need for accurate record-keeping and compliance with Central Excise Rules to prevent duty evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255176</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the duty demand against M/s. Agmotex Ltd. for evasion through parallel invoices and unrecorded production, resulting in penalties on the Director and Manager. The penalties were reduced due to disproportionality. The decision stressed the need for accurate record-keeping and compliance with Central Excise Rules to prevent duty evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>