<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255171</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s writ petition challenging a deposit order of Rs. 25 lakhs by the Tribunal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, citing financial constraints. Despite being granted an extension, the appellant failed to comply with the deposit order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the Tribunal. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and Tribunal orders regarding deposit requirements for appeals related to duty demands or penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255171</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s writ petition challenging a deposit order of Rs. 25 lakhs by the Tribunal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, citing financial constraints. Despite being granted an extension, the appellant failed to comply with the deposit order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the Tribunal. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and Tribunal orders regarding deposit requirements for appeals related to duty demands or penalties under the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>