https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255151 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit under Rule 2(m) as it was found attributable to its manufacturing activity and emphasized the importance of not letting procedural delays deny justice. The appeal was dismissed regarding credit from xerox copies of invoices, but no penalty was imposed due to procedural issues. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted the credit for CHA services as there was no evidence to disprove the appellant's claim, highlighting the need to balance procedural and substantial laws for justice. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255151 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit under Rule 2(m) as it was found attributable to its manufacturing activity and emphasized the importance of not letting procedural delays deny justice. The appeal was dismissed regarding credit from xerox copies of invoices, but no penalty was imposed due to procedural issues. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted the credit for CHA services as there was no evidence to disprove the appellant's claim, highlighting the need to balance procedural and substantial laws for justice. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255151