<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255150</link>
    <description>The bench granted stay applications in a case involving denial of CENVAT Credit on capital goods, inputs, and input services, penalties, and interest. The appellant, a port services provider, sought credit for items used in constructing a jetty and output services. The bench noted significant amounts related to cement and steel, with some credits allowed or under review. The lack of detailed evidence hindered distinguishing admissible credits. Emphasizing the need for thorough examination and citing favorable precedents, the bench approved the stay applications for further consideration, underlining the importance of robust documentary evidence and judicial guidance in determining credit admissibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255150</link>
      <description>The bench granted stay applications in a case involving denial of CENVAT Credit on capital goods, inputs, and input services, penalties, and interest. The appellant, a port services provider, sought credit for items used in constructing a jetty and output services. The bench noted significant amounts related to cement and steel, with some credits allowed or under review. The lack of detailed evidence hindered distinguishing admissible credits. Emphasizing the need for thorough examination and citing favorable precedents, the bench approved the stay applications for further consideration, underlining the importance of robust documentary evidence and judicial guidance in determining credit admissibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>