<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 327 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255128</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision, affirming the Commission&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 127B of the Customs Act to settle the case involving suspected smuggling activities, despite the petitioner&#039;s objections. The ruling emphasized the need to interpret statutory provisions broadly and upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s authority in settling the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 327 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255128</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision, affirming the Commission&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 127B of the Customs Act to settle the case involving suspected smuggling activities, despite the petitioner&#039;s objections. The ruling emphasized the need to interpret statutory provisions broadly and upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s authority in settling the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>