<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 326 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255127</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Misc. applications and subsequent appeal concerning the classification of imported coal as &quot;bituminous coal&quot; and duty demand confirmation. The judgment highlighted the requirement of pre-deposit under section 129E of the Customs Act, emphasizing its mandatory nature for appeal admissibility. The appellants&#039; failure to comply with the pre-deposit provision led to the dismissal of their appeal, emphasizing the significance of adhering to statutory requirements in customs cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:35:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 326 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255127</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Misc. applications and subsequent appeal concerning the classification of imported coal as &quot;bituminous coal&quot; and duty demand confirmation. The judgment highlighted the requirement of pre-deposit under section 129E of the Customs Act, emphasizing its mandatory nature for appeal admissibility. The appellants&#039; failure to comply with the pre-deposit provision led to the dismissal of their appeal, emphasizing the significance of adhering to statutory requirements in customs cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>