<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 323 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Stay Petitions, concluding that there was no reason to stay the operation of the Orders-in-Appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that what is abated cannot be indirectly taken away, and held that the Importer fulfilling the obligation of paying both CVD and Sales Tax/VAT is entitled to a refund of the CVD paid when goods are exempted from Sales Tax, simplifying the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 323 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Stay Petitions, concluding that there was no reason to stay the operation of the Orders-in-Appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that what is abated cannot be indirectly taken away, and held that the Importer fulfilling the obligation of paying both CVD and Sales Tax/VAT is entitled to a refund of the CVD paid when goods are exempted from Sales Tax, simplifying the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>