<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 647 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168105</link>
    <description>Retrospective sales tax exemption could be granted under section 10(1) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, but section 10(3) empowered only cancellation or variation of the notification and did not authorise retrospective withdrawal by express words or necessary implication. A cancellation that fastened liability for an earlier period therefore exceeded delegated power and was ultra vires. The exemption could not be withdrawn for the past period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 647 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168105</link>
      <description>Retrospective sales tax exemption could be granted under section 10(1) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, but section 10(3) empowered only cancellation or variation of the notification and did not authorise retrospective withdrawal by express words or necessary implication. A cancellation that fastened liability for an earlier period therefore exceeded delegated power and was ultra vires. The exemption could not be withdrawn for the past period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>