https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168104 Retrospective curtailment of a purchaser's right to annul under-tenures and eject under-tenants was held to be a reasonable restriction on the freedom to acquire, hold and dispose of property under Article 19(1)(f), because it regulated incidents of ownership in the public interest while preserving title and substituting tenant-protective benefits. The same amendment was also held not to amount to a taking or acquisition of property under Article 31(2), since it did not transfer title or take possession, but only limited one incident of ownership; at most, it operated as deprivation by authority of law under Article 31(1). en-us Thu, 17 Dec 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168104 Retrospective curtailment of a purchaser's right to annul under-tenures and eject under-tenants was held to be a reasonable restriction on the freedom to acquire, hold and dispose of property under Article 19(1)(f), because it regulated incidents of ownership in the public interest while preserving title and substituting tenant-protective benefits. The same amendment was also held not to amount to a taking or acquisition of property under Article 31(2), since it did not transfer title or take possession, but only limited one incident of ownership; at most, it operated as deprivation by authority of law under Article 31(1). Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 17 Dec 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168104