<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 316 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside both issues for further examination by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was allowed partly for statistical purposes, adjusting the loss on the sale of the car as a business asset under section 32, while denying losses on other assets as the block of assets ceased to exist.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 316 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside both issues for further examination by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was allowed partly for statistical purposes, adjusting the loss on the sale of the car as a business asset under section 32, while denying losses on other assets as the block of assets ceased to exist.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>