<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 302 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method as the appropriate benchmarking method for the international transactions between the assessee and its Associated Enterprise (AE). The Transfer Pricing Adjustment made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was deemed unsustainable. The decision, pronounced on 13th October 2014, upheld the use of the CUP method and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:46:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 302 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method as the appropriate benchmarking method for the international transactions between the assessee and its Associated Enterprise (AE). The Transfer Pricing Adjustment made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was deemed unsustainable. The decision, pronounced on 13th October 2014, upheld the use of the CUP method and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>