https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168099 Preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was upheld where short delays in reporting the order to the State Government and the Central Government were reasonably explained and did not breach the statutory time requirements. The Act did not require communication of the State Government's approval to the detenu, and the Court treated the approval as an administrative step. The detention grounds were held sufficiently particularised to permit an effective representation, while allegations of vagueness, mala fides, collateral purpose, identity error, date discrepancies, and language prejudice were rejected for want of substantiation. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2015 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168099 Preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was upheld where short delays in reporting the order to the State Government and the Central Government were reasonably explained and did not breach the statutory time requirements. The Act did not require communication of the State Government's approval to the detenu, and the Court treated the approval as an administrative step. The detention grounds were held sufficiently particularised to permit an effective representation, while allegations of vagueness, mala fides, collateral purpose, identity error, date discrepancies, and language prejudice were rejected for want of substantiation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168099