<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 284 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255085</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part, upholding the demand related to adjusted CENVAT credit but remanding the discrepancy in utilization figures for further review. The penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside based on the belief held by the appellant and the nature of the demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 284 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255085</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part, upholding the demand related to adjusted CENVAT credit but remanding the discrepancy in utilization figures for further review. The penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside based on the belief held by the appellant and the nature of the demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>