<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 282 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255083</link>
    <description>An arrangement under which buses were placed at another operator&#039;s commercial disposal, with that operator controlling routes, fares, timings and fare collection, was treated as taxable renting of cabs for the post-1 June 2007 period because the amended definition extended beyond the Motor Vehicles Act concept of a rent-a-cab. The Tribunal also upheld invocation of the extended limitation period, noting the contractual description and a clarificatory circular indicating taxability after the amendment. Penalties were waived for reasonable cause, and the receipts were directed to be re-quantified on a cum-tax basis after examining abatement, with fresh adjudication on quantification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 282 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255083</link>
      <description>An arrangement under which buses were placed at another operator&#039;s commercial disposal, with that operator controlling routes, fares, timings and fare collection, was treated as taxable renting of cabs for the post-1 June 2007 period because the amended definition extended beyond the Motor Vehicles Act concept of a rent-a-cab. The Tribunal also upheld invocation of the extended limitation period, noting the contractual description and a clarificatory circular indicating taxability after the amendment. Penalties were waived for reasonable cause, and the receipts were directed to be re-quantified on a cum-tax basis after examining abatement, with fresh adjudication on quantification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>