https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255073 The Tribunal allowed appeals in a case concerning the claim of cenvat credit on pet coke by cement manufacturers. Discrepancies in evidence and unreliable test reports led to the dismissal of penalties and interest imposed by the Commissioner. The Tribunal also dismissed penalties on directors due to lack of cross-examination opportunities for witnesses. Appeals related to the cancellation of supplier registrations were dismissed based on doubts raised by discrepancies in sample testing methodologies. The Tribunal found errors in confirming duty demands due to unreliable evidence and lack of credible reports, emphasizing the importance of cross-examination in the decision-making process. en-us Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255073 The Tribunal allowed appeals in a case concerning the claim of cenvat credit on pet coke by cement manufacturers. Discrepancies in evidence and unreliable test reports led to the dismissal of penalties and interest imposed by the Commissioner. The Tribunal also dismissed penalties on directors due to lack of cross-examination opportunities for witnesses. Appeals related to the cancellation of supplier registrations were dismissed based on doubts raised by discrepancies in sample testing methodologies. The Tribunal found errors in confirming duty demands due to unreliable evidence and lack of credible reports, emphasizing the importance of cross-examination in the decision-making process. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255073