<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 271 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255072</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s directive for the petitioner to pre-deposit 10% of the entire demand unjustified, as it lacked consistency with a similar case. The Court quashed the order, aligning the pre-deposit amount with the duty demand within the limitation period to ensure fair treatment based on established legal principles and uniformity in judicial decision-making.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 271 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255072</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s directive for the petitioner to pre-deposit 10% of the entire demand unjustified, as it lacked consistency with a similar case. The Court quashed the order, aligning the pre-deposit amount with the duty demand within the limitation period to ensure fair treatment based on established legal principles and uniformity in judicial decision-making.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>