https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255054 The High Court clarified that the Tribunal lacks authority to extend stay beyond 365 days. As the petitioner's appeal was delayed for reasons not attributable to them, the High Court decided that the petitioner cannot approach the Tribunal for further extension of stay. However, considering the active appeal proceedings and previous court orders, the High Court continued the stay on recovery of the balance amount until the appeal's disposal under Article 226 of the Constitution, in the interest of justice. en-us Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2015 06:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255054 The High Court clarified that the Tribunal lacks authority to extend stay beyond 365 days. As the petitioner's appeal was delayed for reasons not attributable to them, the High Court decided that the petitioner cannot approach the Tribunal for further extension of stay. However, considering the active appeal proceedings and previous court orders, the High Court continued the stay on recovery of the balance amount until the appeal's disposal under Article 226 of the Constitution, in the interest of justice. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255054