<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 249 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision to treat the two firms as separate entities for income tax assessment. Despite common partners, the firms were considered distinct entities due to maintaining separate financial records and operations. The judgment emphasized the significance of preserving financial independence between separate firms, reinforcing that each entity should be evaluated based on its individual financial standing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 06:43:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 249 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision to treat the two firms as separate entities for income tax assessment. Despite common partners, the firms were considered distinct entities due to maintaining separate financial records and operations. The judgment emphasized the significance of preserving financial independence between separate firms, reinforcing that each entity should be evaluated based on its individual financial standing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>