<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 243 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255044</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee in the challenge against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the disallowance of interest under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that once interest is allowed in a previous year without any change in conditions, it cannot be disallowed in the current year. Emphasizing the importance of consistency in the Revenue&#039;s approach, the Court allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 06:43:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 243 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255044</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee in the challenge against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the disallowance of interest under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that once interest is allowed in a previous year without any change in conditions, it cannot be disallowed in the current year. Emphasizing the importance of consistency in the Revenue&#039;s approach, the Court allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>