<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 241 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255042</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding the CIT&#039;s decision to cancel the A.O.&#039;s order under Section 263 as a serious error in law. The Court held that the A.O.&#039;s interpretation of Section 80HHC was correct, and the CIT&#039;s action was unjustified. The decision was based on the analysis of relevant sections of the Income Tax Act and legal precedents, ultimately upholding the assessee&#039;s position in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 06:43:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 241 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255042</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, finding the CIT&#039;s decision to cancel the A.O.&#039;s order under Section 263 as a serious error in law. The Court held that the A.O.&#039;s interpretation of Section 80HHC was correct, and the CIT&#039;s action was unjustified. The decision was based on the analysis of relevant sections of the Income Tax Act and legal precedents, ultimately upholding the assessee&#039;s position in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>