<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 230 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order confirming demand for service tax. Despite explanations including consultations with experts, administrative changes, office renovation, file misplacement, and lack of awareness, the Tribunal found discrepancies and insufficient justifications. Consequently, the delay was not condoned, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 230 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order confirming demand for service tax. Despite explanations including consultations with experts, administrative changes, office renovation, file misplacement, and lack of awareness, the Tribunal found discrepancies and insufficient justifications. Consequently, the delay was not condoned, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>