<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 212 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255013</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the additional storage space in their license. The lower authorities were directed to implement the order within 30 days. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the importance of production capacity increase and proper permissions in justifying the need for additional storage space. The judgment highlighted the absence of legal barriers to adding space and the significance of the Development Commissioner&#039;s approval in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 212 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255013</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the additional storage space in their license. The lower authorities were directed to implement the order within 30 days. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the importance of production capacity increase and proper permissions in justifying the need for additional storage space. The judgment highlighted the absence of legal barriers to adding space and the significance of the Development Commissioner&#039;s approval in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>