<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 202 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255003</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on all issues, ruling that the disputed expenditures were revenue in nature and should be allowed in the year they were incurred. The Court emphasized the importance of accurately reflecting the assessee&#039;s financial position and income, dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=373312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 202 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255003</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on all issues, ruling that the disputed expenditures were revenue in nature and should be allowed in the year they were incurred. The Court emphasized the importance of accurately reflecting the assessee&#039;s financial position and income, dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>